Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Aegis › Readiness & Timeline
Readiness & Timeline

Gate Two in Depth: A Regime Beyond Any Device

The plug plasma sits 166 to 830 times beyond the operating point of any mirror ever run, so its behaviour cannot be post-dicted from existing data.

The extrapolation problem

Confidence in plasma performance normally comes from post-dicting operated machines and extrapolating modestly. The Aegis plug asks for an operating point 166–830x beyond the envelope of any tandem mirror that has ever run. At that distance, no code can be said to be validated for the regime; the prediction is an extrapolation, not a fit.

Operated mirror envelopereferenceAegis plug (low est.)166xAegis plug (high est.)830x

Why distance matters

Transport, stability, and micro-instability physics can change character across such a span. A model tuned to today's devices may miss loss channels that only appear at the Aegis point. This is why we call the plug performance un-post-dictable today rather than uncertain-but-likely.

What could close it

An extrapolation of this size is qualitatively different from ordinary uncertainty. Within the range of operated devices, a validated code can be trusted a little beyond its data; at 166–830x, the physics itself may change character, introducing loss channels no current model represents. That is why we describe the plug performance as un-post-dictable today rather than merely uncertain.

See closing the regime gate and regime-scaling experiments.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage