Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
MetroVolt › Readiness & Timeline
Readiness & Timeline

The Magnetic-Well Question

Tandem mirrors need a stable configuration at useful plasma pressure; whether a sufficient magnetic well exists at feasible β is unresolved.

Stability at pressure

Magnetic confinement must be stable: the plasma should sit in an effective magnetic well so that pressure-driven instabilities do not eject it. In a tandem mirror this is achieved through field shaping. The open question is whether a configuration provides an adequate well at the plasma pressure (β) MetroVolt needs for useful output.

High β is desirable for power density but stresses stability; low β is easier to stabilize but reduces output. The design must find a point that is both stable and productive. Whether that point exists at feasible field and geometry is part of the same open question as plug confinement.

Design tension (schematic)Higher β — more power densityHigher β — harder to stabilizeAdequate magnetic well needed

Why simulation is not the last word

Stability at the relevant pressure involves kinetic and geometric effects that models capture imperfectly. This is a measure-it question. The test unit is built precisely to observe whether the configuration holds at the intended β.

Until then, MetroVolt treats the stable-well assumption as a design premise under test, not a settled fact.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage