Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Defense › Readiness, Standards & Dual-Use
Readiness, Standards & Dual-Use

The Standards Landscape

A map of the codes and standards a fusion facility designs to, and how they fit together.

Why standards, and which ones

Standards encode hard-won engineering experience and give regulators, insurers, and partners a common yardstick. A fusion facility touches many standards families at once: nuclear quality assurance, pressure-boundary codes, instrumentation and control, functional safety, cybersecurity, radiation protection, and materials qualification. Kronos designs to recognized standards rather than inventing private criteria.

Standards families a fusion plant touchesQuality assuranceNQA-1, ISO 9001Pressure boundaryASME BPVCInstrumentation & controlIEEE, IEC 61513Functional safetyIEC 61508 / 61511CybersecurityIEC 62443, NISTRadiation protectionICRP-based limitsMaterialsRCC-MRx, ASTM

How the families relate

The regulatory context

For a facility whose primary output is byproduct material — isotopes and neutrons — a byproduct-material regulatory framework (in the United States, an NRC Part 30 approach) is a natural fit and is being pursued through pre-application engagement. Standards and regulation are complementary: standards say how to build well, regulation says what is permitted, and both are approached openly.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage