Cybersecurity Standards
IEC 62443 and NIST frameworks protect the plant's control and safety systems from digital compromise.
A fusion plant is a cyber-physical system
The plant's control, protection, and monitoring run on networked digital systems (operational technology, OT). Compromise of these systems is a safety and availability risk, not merely a data risk. Kronos designs to recognized cybersecurity standards — IEC 62443 for industrial automation and control, and NIST frameworks for broader risk management, including post-quantum-aware cryptography.
Principles applied
- Segmentation into zones and conduits so a breach cannot roam the whole plant.
- Least-privilege access and strong authentication for control functions.
- Independence of safety-protection systems, so a cyber event on control cannot disable protection.
- Continuous monitoring and an incident-response plan, not just perimeter defense.
Why this belongs in defense readiness
For a resilient sovereign-power role, the ability to keep operating under digital as well as physical stress is part of the value. A plant that provides power on a fixed installation must be defensible in the cyber domain by design. Kronos discusses this posture at the level of standards and principles only; it does not disclose specific system configurations, and it treats OT security as a first-class readiness dimension alongside physical safety.