Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › Mathematical Foundations
Mathematical Foundations

Equilibrium Reconstruction as an Inverse Problem

Real-time reconstruction fits a Grad-Shafranov solution to magnetic and kinetic diagnostics, an ill-posed inverse problem regularized and accelerated for the control loop.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

The reconstruction problem

Equilibrium reconstruction infers the internal flux distribution psi and the free profiles p'(psi), F F'(psi) from external measurements: flux loops, Mirnov coils, and kinetic diagnostics such as Thomson scattering and interferometry. It is the breeder's most fundamental state-estimation task, feeding the KRONOS-CTRL twin and every shape and stability calculation.

text
Constrained least-squares (EFIT-style):

  minimize   sum_m  ( (M_m[psi] - d_m) / sigma_m )^2  +  R[psi]
  subject to Delta* psi = -mu0 R^2 p'(psi) - F F'(psi)   (GS constraint)

  M_m[psi] : predicted value of diagnostic m (linear in psi)
  d_m      : measured value ,  sigma_m : uncertainty
  R[psi]   : regularization on profile smoothness

Why it is ill-posed

External magnetic measurements constrain the plasma boundary and total current well but the internal current profile only weakly - many internal profiles fit the same external signals. This is the classic magnetics-only degeneracy. Adding kinetic constraints (pressure from Thomson, density from interferometry, current direction from motional Stark or polarimetry) and profile regularization breaks the degeneracy.

python
# Gauss-Newton reconstruction step (schematic)
# unknowns: basis coeffs for pprime(psi), ffprime(psi)
for it in range(max_it):
    psi   = solve_GS(pprime(c), ffprime(c))     # forward solve
    r     = (predict(psi) - d) / sigma          # weighted residual
    J     = jacobian_predict_wrt_c(psi, c)      # sensitivity
    dc    = solve( J.T@J + gamma*Reg, -J.T@r )   # regularized GN
    c    += dc
    if norm(dc) < tol: break

Real-time acceleration

A full Gauss-Newton reconstruction is too slow for the fast control loop. The stack keeps the rigorous solve as ground truth and runs a PINN-based reconstruction that maps diagnostic vectors directly to psi and profiles in one forward pass, retrained against the offline solver. The PINN carries the Grad-Shafranov residual so its output is a physically admissible equilibrium, not just a regression fit.

Reconstruction confidence is reported, not assumed: where diagnostic coverage is sparse the uncertainty widens and downstream MPC enlarges its margins accordingly.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage