Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
EHS › The Safety Case
The Safety Case

Vacuum Vessel Integrity

The vacuum vessel is the primary structural boundary; its failure de-confines the plasma and ends the reaction inward.

The plasma burns inside a high-vacuum vessel that serves as the first structural confinement boundary. Its integrity matters for both operation and safety, but its failure mode is benign: a breach lets air in, which immediately cools and extinguishes the plasma. The vessel fails toward off, not toward release.

Roles of the vessel

Building confinementCryostatVacuum vesselFirst wallPlasma
The vacuum vessel is the primary structural barrier, backed by cryostat and building.

An in-vessel leak (air ingress) is a self-terminating event for the plasma: the fragile burn conditions collapse the instant vacuum is lost. A leak the other direction is bounded by the small in-vessel radioactive inventory — activated dust and residual tritium — and is caught by the surrounding cryostat and building confinement. The vessel is one layer of defense in depth, not the sole barrier.

Integrity assurance

The vessel is designed, fabricated, and inspected to pressure-boundary standards, with leak testing and in-service monitoring. Because the pressures involved are modest and the internal energy is small, the structural demands are far lighter than for a high-pressure fission primary system. See confinement barriers.

A vacuum-vessel fault is contained by design and, for the reaction, self-correcting.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage