Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › Mathematical Foundations
Mathematical Foundations

Resistive Wall Mode Mathematics

A perfectly conducting wall stabilizes the external kink, but a real resistive wall lets it grow slowly; feedback control of that growth is a precise linear problem.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

Wall stabilization and its limit

The external kink mode (n = 1) can be stabilized by image currents in a nearby conducting wall - but only if the wall is perfect. A real, finite-conductivity wall lets flux diffuse through on its resistive time, so the mode reappears as a slowly growing resistive wall mode (RWM) with a growth rate set by the wall time, not the fast Alfven time. This slow timescale is exactly what makes feedback control feasible on the breeder.

text
RWM dispersion (thin-wall model, schematic):

  gamma * tau_wall  =  ( delta-W_infinity ) / ( -delta-W_b )

  delta-W_infinity : energy with wall at infinity (no wall)
  delta-W_b        : energy with ideal wall at wall radius
  tau_wall = mu0 * sigma_wall * d * b   (wall resistive time)

  Stable-with-ideal-wall but unstable-without -> RWM window
  Growth rate ~ 1/tau_wall  (slow, milliseconds)

Feedback as pole placement

Active coils sense the growing radial field and drive currents to cancel it. Modeled as a low-order linear system, the RWM plus feedback is a pole-placement problem: choose controller gains so the closed-loop growth rate becomes negative. Because the open-loop growth is slow, modest gains suffice, but sensor noise and coil dynamics set the achievable margin.

python
# RWM feedback as a scalar state-space loop
# x_dot = gamma*x + b*u  ; y = x + noise ; u = -K*y
# closed loop: x_dot = (gamma - b*K) x - b*K*noise
def closed_loop_rate(gamma, b, K):
    return gamma - b*K          # want < 0 for stability
# margin shrinks as measurement noise or actuator lag grow

Where it fits the stack

The RWM controller is a fast inner loop; the AI supervises it rather than replacing it. The twin estimates delta-W margins and the mode amplitude from magnetics, and the anomaly ensemble flags a growing n = 1 signature as a disruption precursor. If the estimated growth outpaces the controller's authority, L3 requests a scenario change before the protection failsafe would trigger.

The RWM model is a design-and-simulation construct; wall time and mode couplings will be measured and the model updated after first plasma.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage