Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › L0 · Foundation
L0 · Foundation

PINN Training Workloads

Training physics-informed neural networks that solve Grad-Shafranov and MHD residuals natively for fast twin evaluation.

THE STACK · click to jumpL7Ecosystem & StrategyL6Experience & VisualizationL5Applications & CopilotsL4OrchestrationL3Twin Modeling & AIL2Data FabricL1Control PlaneL0Foundation▲tlmctl▼L0 · FOUNDATIONThe offline compute substrate — multi-physics & batch training.1Cloud HPCelastic burst2Bare-Metal ClusterGPU / CPU3Supercomputingmulti-physics runs4Batch Trainingmodel builds5Simulation FarmGrad-Shafranov · MHD6Object StorecheckpointsMACHINE TIETrains the models that ship UP to L3 — no real-time path to the machine.KRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORFOUNDATIONSHEET 02REV. 2026-08L0 · AI-NATIVE STACK
L0 · Foundation — its place in the stack (left, click any layer) and its internal components (right). Telemetry rises; control descends.

Neural networks that obey physics

A physics-informed neural network (PINN) is trained not only to fit data but to satisfy a governing equation. Kronos trains PINNs on L0 to solve the breeder's Grad-Shafranov equilibrium and MHD stability relations natively, so the twin can evaluate physics in a single forward pass instead of iterating a solver. The GPU clusters exist largely to make these training runs feasible.

The residual loss

The PINN's loss penalizes the residual of the PDE itself, evaluated by automatic differentiation of the network, plus boundary and data terms. Minimizing this loss forces the network toward a solution that respects the physics, not merely one that interpolates points. This is what lets a PINN generalize across operating conditions rather than memorize.

python
# PINN loss for Grad-Shafranov (schematic):
# L = w_pde * mean( GS_residual(psi_net)^2 )
#   + w_bc  * mean( boundary(psi_net)^2 )
#   + w_data* mean( (psi_net - psi_obs)^2 )
# GS_residual computed via autodiff of the network psi_net(R,Z)

Why training is expensive

Each training step evaluates differential-operator residuals over large collocation sets and backpropagates through them, which is memory-bandwidth-heavy and iteration-intensive. Balancing the loss terms, physics versus data versus boundary, is delicate, so training often includes hyperparameter search. This is dense GPU work that belongs firmly in offline L0.

PINNs serve both machines. The breeder trains equilibrium and stability PINNs around the negative-triangularity design point; the burner trains PINNs for its mirror equilibrium and ambipolar potential. The technique is shared; the governing equations and geometry differ.

Once trained and validated, a PINN is compiled and quantized for the real-time twin, where it evaluates equilibrium or stability inside the 50 to 100 ms budget. The expensive training is the price L0 pays so the twin can honor physics at millisecond speed.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage