Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › Mathematical Foundations
Mathematical Foundations

Gaussian Processes

A Gaussian process is a distribution over functions; it gives the stack calibrated surrogates with built-in error bars, ideal for scarce fusion data.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

A prior over functions

A Gaussian process (GP) places a prior directly on functions: any finite set of points is jointly Gaussian, with correlations set by a kernel. Conditioning on observations yields a posterior mean (the surrogate prediction) and posterior variance (its uncertainty) in closed form. GPs are the stack's default surrogate where data is scarce and honest error bars are essential.

text
GP: f ~ GP( m(x), k(x,x') )

Posterior at test points X* given data (X, y):
  mean = K*  (K + sigma^2 I)^-1 y
  cov  = K** - K* (K + sigma^2 I)^-1 K*'

  K   = k(X, X)   (train-train)
  K*  = k(X*, X)  (test-train)
  common kernel: k(x,x') = s^2 exp(-||x-x'||^2 / 2 l^2)  (RBF)

Kernels encode assumptions

The kernel is where prior knowledge lives: smoothness (RBF), roughness (Matern), periodicity, or length scales that differ per input. Hyperparameters - length scale, signal and noise variance - are learned by maximizing the marginal likelihood, which trades data fit against smoothness automatically, guarding against overfit on small datasets.

python
# GP marginal likelihood for hyperparameter fit (schematic)
def nll(params, X, y):
    K = kernel(X, X, params) + params.noise*I
    L = cholesky(K)
    a = cho_solve(L, y)
    return 0.5*y@a + sum(log(diag(L))) + 0.5*n*log(2*pi)
params = minimize(nll, init, args=(X, y))   # maximize evidence

Where GPs serve the machines

GPs surrogate expensive maps - a scalar stability margin versus operating parameters, a confinement metric versus profiles - with uncertainty that grows away from data. That growing variance is exactly what scenario optimization needs to avoid overconfident extrapolation, and it is central to the burner, where the GP's error bars balloon in the 166-830x regime rather than pretending to knowledge that does not exist.

The cubic cost of the exact GP limits dataset size, so the stack uses sparse/inducing-point approximations for larger problems - trading a little fidelity for scale while keeping the calibrated uncertainty that motivates using a GP at all.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage