Forward Uncertainty Propagation
Forward UQ pushes known input distributions through a model to compute the resulting distribution, moments, and failure probabilities of the output.
The forward problem
Given uncertain inputs described by probability distributions, forward uncertainty propagation asks: what is the distribution of the output? The goal may be the mean and variance, the full probability density, a quantile, or the probability that the output exceeds a safety threshold. It is the most common UQ task in engineering design.
Sampling methods
Monte Carlo is the baseline: draw input samples from their distributions, evaluate the model for each, and build output statistics from the results. It is simple, dimension-independent in convergence rate, and robust, but its error shrinks only as one over the square root of the sample count, so it needs many runs. Quasi-Monte Carlo and Latin hypercube sampling improve this for smooth problems.
Spectral and surrogate methods
- Polynomial chaos expansions give mean, variance, and Sobol indices in closed form for smooth responses
- Gaussian-process emulators propagate uncertainty with error bars from few runs
- Stochastic collocation evaluates on a sparse grid of quadrature points
- The delta method uses a first-order Taylor expansion for small uncertainties
Moment propagation shortcut
For small input uncertainties, a first-order Taylor expansion propagates variance cheaply: output variance is approximately the sum over inputs of (partial derivative)^2 times input variance. This linearization is fast but fails for nonlinear responses or large uncertainties, where full sampling is required.
Rare events
When the quantity of interest is a small failure probability, plain Monte Carlo is inefficient because failures are rare. Importance sampling, subset simulation, and first- and second-order reliability methods concentrate effort near the failure boundary to estimate small probabilities with far fewer runs.
In design practice
Forward UQ turns a Kronos performance prediction into a distribution rather than a single figure. Uncertain physics inputs are propagated through surrogates of the machines to report expected performance with credible intervals, and to estimate the chance of crossing an operating limit - always distinguishing simulated ranges from any future measured result.