The engine, in your hands

Run the MetroVolt physics yourself.

Most fusion companies publish claims. We published the machine that generates them — and this page runs it, live, in your browser. A WebAssembly Python runtime loads the same reduced-order engine deposited on Zenodo with the MetroVolt design paper: Bosch–Hale reactivities, the profile-integrated Mode-C burn point, the S78 field lever, the S63 cost ladder. Nothing is mocked and nothing leaves your tab — before any control unlocks, the engine re-derives the paper's frozen numbers in front of you.

81
deposited analyses
43 / 0 / 4
reproduction OK · fail · skip
2,409 MW
re-derived on load
CC BY 4.0
open license

Four instruments

The frozen burn point

S01 · KX1 · S26

The flagship. Move core ion temperature, density, and the D–³He mix on the frozen machine — fusion power, neutron fraction, wall load, and the required confinement recompute live, with honesty badges that trip the moment you leave the paper's stated envelope.

Open the burn explorer →

Why hot ions

KX1 · S05

The four fusion reactivity curves, from the verbatim Bosch–Hale coefficients. See why D–³He turns on an order of magnitude above D–T temperatures — and what it pays back in charged products instead of neutrons.

Open the reactivity curves →

The field lever

S78

Bpeak = B₀R₀/Rc, against two hard lines: the demonstrated 24.4 T single-coil value and the frozen 24.6 T design point. The deposited baseline / bank / spend cases are one click away.

Open the field lever →

The cost ladder

S63 · Table 26

Wright's-law learning on FOAK capital, from the deposited basis. Reproduces the paper's printed Table-26 cells at the defaults — then lets you stress every assumption yourself.

Open the cost ladder →

Built on the open record

The Zenodo deposit

Every equation on these pages traces to the citable archive: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21248916 — 81 analyses, all Tier-1 code, Tier-2 flagship-code decks, CC BY 4.0. One command reproduces the results.

What's in the deposit →

The design paper

A single comprehensive manuscript in four parts — equilibrium to levelised cost under one consistency chain. arXiv preprint (physics.plasm-ph) posting July 2026; submitted to IOP Nuclear Fusion.

Reader-friendly whitepapers →

The simulation register

All 81 analyses, S01–S81, each mapped to its inputs, code, outputs, and pass/fail status — including the adverse and null results, deposited on purpose.

Browse the register →
What this is — and is not Every number here is computed, gate-adjudicated output of a reduced-order model — the same coefficients, profiles, and formulas deposited at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21248916. It is not a measurement and not a hardware claim. The 2.41 GW figure is the hot-ion ceiling; holding the hot-ion state is one of the paper's two stated feasibility gaps (the S26 gate), and the near-thermal baseline is ≈1.5 GW. Required confinement H₉₈ ≈ 1.8–2.2 against a demonstrated NT record of 1.0–1.2 is the other gap — published as a bet, not blended away. The citable record is the Zenodo deposit; these pages are a live demonstration of it.
KRONOS FUSION ENERGY · MetroVolt Live Physics Zenodo · Whitepapers · Simulations · runs entirely in your browser — nothing is sent to any server