Environment · safety · infrastructure

Cleaner by design — and the engineering is tractable.

The hard part — a solved, reproduced power balance — is closed. What remains is engineering and procurement with known solutions: environment, siting, waste, and balance-of-plant. Every figure here is from the frozen record and carries its condition. No cost figures. Low-neutron, never aneutronic.

Environment & safety

HYPERION — the breeder

D–T spherical tokamak

Public dose CLOSES. Required detritiation factor 1–34 across realistic HTO release — versus ITER-class 1,000–10,000 demonstrated. A design task with an off-the-shelf solution, not a physics gap.

Waste ≤ Class C. At a certified low-activation RAFM steel heat (Nb < 10 ppm). A steel procurement spec, routinely certified; ordinary steel would be higher class. Open: the Ag-108m residual needs a certified-heat assay + regulatory determination.

Designed in. Remote federal siting; tritium containment and detritiation scoped from the outset; emergency plan built in. Durability → capacity factor is a single design lever.

The burner — Aegis / MetroVolt

D–³He tandem mirror

Low-neutron, not aneutronic. f_n 5.44% at the design point; the fleet's wall-loading is 41× (Aegis) / 168× (MetroVolt) below the breeder, and falls further as the ³He fraction rises.

Scheduled waste ≈ zero. 0.035–0.144 first-wall changes in 30 years (first-wall life 104–428 fpy) — a direct consequence of the low neutron fraction.

No breeding blanket, no divertor. An open magnetic system with direct energy conversion — fewer activated components to begin with.

Read it honestly These are design requirements shown with their conditions — achievable with known solutions, not yet demonstrated hardware. The burner's closure is requirement-class (it needs the end-plug density, 347× GDT), and the Ag-108m residual and the absolute activated-inventory run remain open. Same frozen physics throughout (breeder Q 3.076; burner Q_E 1.31).

Infrastructure — balance of plant

SubsystemConventional D–T tokamakHYPERION breederKronos burner (mirror)
Breeding blanketrequiredthe breeding blanket is the productnone
Divertorrequireddivertor exhaust (open design item)none — open field lines
Edge instabilitiesELMs to mitigatenegative-triangularity, ELM-freenone — open system
Energy conversionthermal — steam cycle + turbinegain only (no electricity)direct — no steam cycle, no turbine
Neutron shieldingheavy (14 MeV, ~80% of power)heavy (D–T, its product)light (low-neutron D–³He)
Fuel supplyexternal tritiumbreeds its own T + He-3helium-3 (lunar at commercial scale)

The burner removes the blanket, the divertor, and the entire thermal island — a large balance-of-plant simplification that follows directly from low-neutron D–³He fuel plus direct conversion.

Why these fuels

FuelIgnition / reactivityNeutron outputNeedsKronos use
D–Tlights first (~4–13 keV; peaks ~64 keV)~80% of energy as 14 MeV neutronstritium breedingBREEDER (gain only)
Catalysed D–Dmoderateneutron-heavyno external tritiumstudied; not the burner
D–³Heturns on hot (~60–90 keV)low — ~5.4% (D–D side reactions only)helium-3 (lunar at scale)BURNER — direct conversion
p–¹¹Bvery hot~aneutronic in principlebremsstrahlung-limitednot chosen — see note

Kronos's own "four-way test" shows aneutronic fuel, native direct-conversion, and low cost are mutually exclusive — you cannot have all three. D–³He is the deliberate choice: low-neutron and directly convertible. See the reactivity curves.

How Kronos compares

Mainstream fusion is D–T magnetic confinement (ITER, and the high-field tokamak class such as SPARC): powerful, but ~80% of the energy is 14 MeV neutrons, converted thermally through a steam cycle behind heavy blankets, divertors, and shielding. Kronos takes a different path — breed the scarce fuel first, then burn it low-neutron with direct conversion. Against published reference points:

Reference pointKronosComparator (sourced)
Buildability (plasma current)HYPERION 9.66 MA~⅔ (66%) of ITER's 15 MA — inside built practice
Heating power density2.37 MW/m³≈ 2.2× SPARC
Plug magnet field26.49 T0.82× an existing 32.35 T magnet record
Strategic supplyTBR lever 1.03–1.20 (marginal)frozen OpenMC lever (BR-L2-A7): TBR 1.03–1.06 → 1.18–1.20 solid-Be (marginal) (TBR 1.8) ≈ 2× today's world commercial tritium flow
Public dose (detritiation)factor 1–34 requiredvs ITER-class 1,000–10,000 demonstrated
Plantno blanket · no divertor · no steam cycle (burner)conventional D–T reactor needs all three
Our comparison rule We compare to published reference devices (ITER, SPARC, the 32.35 T magnet record, GDT) and to fuel and architecture classes — not to unverified numbers from other private companies. Every figure here is a conceptual-design and simulation result carrying its stated conditions; the burner's closure remains requirement-class (the 347× GDT plug density is the largest open item).
KRONOS FUSION ENERGY · Live Physics conceptual design and simulation study; no machine has been built