Breeder · D–T · config 22021

The Breeder.

This is the deposited D–T breeder evaluator (dt_evaluator.evaluate() on kronos_clean kernels — pure NumPy, no economics), running the frozen HYPERION point: R₀ 1.2 m, A 2.5, B₀ 8 T, Ti0 15 keV, TBR 1.8. HYPERION's bar is fusion gain only — it makes tritium (marginally; TBR lever 1.03–1.20), helium-3 and 14 MeV neutrons, not electricity (a category error for a breeder). Move the knobs; gain, power, current, neutron fraction and net tritium recompute from the power balance, live. Q 3.076 is solved, not scaled.

HYPERION · spherical-tokamak breeder
The spherical-torus geometry — A 2.5 · R₀ 1.2 m · negative-triangularity D–T plasma on a thin centre stack. The sliders below drive its physics, live.
starting …
Try

Tritium is a blanket lever: the demonstrated the frozen OpenMC lever (gate BR-L2-A7) reaches TBR 1.03–1.06 (literal recipe) and 1.18–1.20 with a solid-Be layer — tritium is marginal, the solid-Be endpoint is the build basis at an advanced blanket (TBR 1.8). The requirement is net TBR ≥ 1.0 — on-model with a thin 3–6% margin (closure H-C1). TBR 1.1/1.5/1.8 is the deposited lever — 14 MeV D–T neutrons support blanket multiplication that 2.45 MeV D–D neutrons cannot.

Gain Q
Pfus/Paux · solved
Fusion power
MW
Plasma current
MA (driven )
Net tritium
kg/yr
Neutron fraction
% of Pfus
βN
NSTX no-wall 4.2
Wall load
MW/m²
Peak coil field
T · demo ≤ 20.1
Power balance · live  —  Pfus = charged + neutron
charged Pchg (stays in the plasma) neutron Pn — the 14 MeV product the blanket breeds on
Operating window · where HYPERION is on duty and closes (live)
closes (on-duty + βN & coil OK) on duty only outside the window your operating point

Recomputed by the deposited engine when you change field, aspect ratio, TBR or fuel — the marker tracks your temperature and density.

Figures from the deposit — click to enlarge
Spherical-tokamak cutaway
Spherical-tokamak cutaway
Radial build
Radial build
Fuel cycle
Fuel cycle
Exhaust radiated fraction
Exhaust / radiated fraction
Environment & safety (Mode D2) — engineering that follows the closed physics

The hard part — a solved power balance at demonstrated confinement — is done and reproduced. What remains is engineering and procurement with known solutions, not physics unknowns:

Public dose · CLOSES
DF 1–34
required detritiation factor vs ITER-class 1,000–10,000 demonstrated — a design task with an off-the-shelf solution
Waste class
≤ Class C
at a certified low-activation RAFM heat (Nb < 10 ppm) — a steel procurement spec, routinely certified
Burner scheduled waste
≈ zero
0.035–0.144 first-wall changes in 30 years (low-neutron D–³He, wall life 104–428 fpy)
Low-neutron fleet
41× / 168×
burner wall-loading below the breeder — Aegis 41×, MetroVolt 168×; cleaner as ³He rises

Same frozen physics (Q 3.076, 85.0 MW). These are design requirements shown with their conditions — achievable with known solutions, not yet demonstrated hardware. Remote federal siting and tritium containment are designed in from the outset. Open: the Ag-108m waste residual (needs a certified-heat assay + regulatory determination) and the absolute activated-inventory run. No cost figures are shown here.

Read the badges honestly HYPERION is sized to the requirement, not to a physics optimum: the duty badge trips when net tritium leaves the marginal breeding band (net TBR ≥ 1.0; lever 1.03–1.20), and the closure badge needs on-model and βN below the NSTX no-wall 4.2 and peak coil field within the demonstrated 20.1 T. Availability is damage-life-limited and the triangularity sign is a declared caveat — both are stated open problems, not hidden. Source: the breeder deposit.
Disruptions — a first-class design fact (gate BR-L2-A10) Current quench is fast: τCQ 7–19 ms (reduced-order L/R on a NIMROD-verified equilibrium). The runaway-electron avalanche is SEVERE — E/Ec ~1128, a multi-MA beam reaching ~70% of Ip from a milliamp seed — so SPI (shattered-pellet injection) mitigation is a hard design requirement, not a caveat. Halo current at 35% of Ip sets the vessel / first-wall mechanical load.
KRONOS FUSION ENERGY · Live Physics Breeder deposit · conceptual design and simulation study; no machine has been built